Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 2" Results 101 - 120 of 2,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 4:13 pm by Shahram Miri
The three litigants in this case involved 2 women and all the plaintiffs were not Muslim. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:33 pm by Xandra Kramer
Several issues are highlighted: first, the existence of an international element in the case of a defendant with unknown domicile whose nationality differs from the state of the court seized; secondly, the application of Article 4(1) Brussels I Regulation if the domicile of the defendant is unknown and (since the ECJ does not apply Article 4(1) in this regard) the interpretation of Article 16(2) Brussels I Regulation; thirdly, the requirement that the… [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am by INFORRM
The order is not directed at any named defendant so there are obvious difficulties in giving notice to the “Persons Unknown”. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., 2023 WL 2372059, No. 2:20−cv−11407 JAK (Ex) (C.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:15 am by Bassel Khalaf and Taite Westendorf
Testimony concerning officer safety needs to be tied to specific observations of criminal activity and not some vague notion of the defendant looking “nervous” or “reaching for an unknown item” that somehow never materializes. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:15 am by Bassel Khalaf and Taite Westendorf
Testimony concerning officer safety needs to be tied to specific observations of criminal activity and not some vague notion of the defendant looking “nervous” or “reaching for an unknown item” that somehow never materializes. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
Practice Tip #2: This newest complaint initiates the latest of three ongoing cases filed by Mr. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The attack, from an unknown source, remained undetected until September 2018, by which time the company had been acquired by Marriott. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Counsel again argued that subsection (b) (2) applies to a different class of litigants. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe (E.D.Pa.): Because the Defendant's identity was unknown, the original Complaint identified him only by his IP address. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:56 am by The Federalist Society
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, erred by defining “context” at too high a level of generality; (2) whether the Second Circuit erred in denying qualified immunity to Defendant Ziglar; and (3) whether the Second Circuit erred in holding that Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Complaint met the pleading requirements identified by the Supreme Court in its 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
But in truth it isn't strange at all: in a world where there aren't many white defendants…" [2] See generally, Arizona v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by Lewis Gainor
The fact that other people were involved unknown to the defendant is not a defense. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:54 am by Lawrence S. Glosser
A recent Washington Supreme Court Case held that: (1) as a matter of first impression, a grantor's duty to defend title, in a Statutory Warranty Deed ("SWD"), is not satisfied by a settlement conceding a third party's claim to title, regardless of the merits, and payment to the grantee of damages for the value of the portion by which the title is diminished, and (2) grantees did not waive the warranty to defend title. [read post]