Search for: "V"
Results 101 - 120
of 491,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Diehl v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Diehl v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] WLR (D) 64 “In all cases where a local authority was seeking possession of a property which constituted a persons home, including persons who had been granted introductory tenancies pursuant to Part V of the Housing Act 1996 and persons who had been granted a licence of property under the homelessness regime in Part VII of the 1996 Act,… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:32 am
WAGNER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:35 pm
Continue reading The post Lightstone Value Plus REIT V (Lightstone V) Investors Face Principal Losses appeared first on Investor Lawyers Blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2 of… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
Carter andRyan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
Carter andRyan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:37 pm
Carter and Ryan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:42 am
Regina (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (Bailey) v Same; Regina (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison Court of Appeal “In the criminal sentencing context, the court could read words into a statutory instrument to correct a drafting omission. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 1:23 pm
Kerik v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:43 am
Stone Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
G v HM Treasury; A and others v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 1187; [2008] WLR (D) 339 “The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 was lawful and validly made under s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 provided certain words were severed from art 4(2) so that it required the Treasury to show that it had reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person designated was involved in committing or facilitating terrorism and not merely might be such a person. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:48 am
Regina v Hodgson; Regina v Pollin Court of Appeal “Where appellants had originally been charged with attempted murder but after discussion agreed to admit a lesser charge, the fact that ‘intent’ was omitted from the indictment was not a fatal flaw. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Kahle v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 2:43 am
Relationship too close for independence of board Regina (Brooke and Another) v Parole Board and Others Regina (O'Connell) v Same Regina (Murphy) v Same Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Parole Board's relationship with central government was such that it did not have sufficient independence to carry out its role of reviewing the continued detention of prisoners lawfully, as required by common law and article 5.4 of the European Convention on… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm
United States and Hill v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 1:50 pm
"V" is for Virginia. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:44 pm
WALKER and RANA RAE WALKER, Third-Party Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
