Search for: "V. H. Cambridge"
Results 101 - 120
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:07 am
KF 1164 J47 2012 Understanding insurance law / Robert H. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Wade to the Present (Cambridge University Press, 2020).David J. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc (Property, intangible) US CAFC reopens DNA detection patent case between Enzo Biochem and former Applera (Law360) US District Court E D California: Antitrust and patent misuse claims tossed in case alleging California Table Grape Commission accepted royalties from growers for invalid patents covering grape varieties (Law360) US: AntiCancer launches second effort to convince federal court that Cambridge Research & Instrumentation infringed… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
* Coverage of Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:15 am
Grassroots Tea Partiers see themselves in a last-ditch effort to save “their country,” and big-money ideologues are determined to undercut Democrats and sabotage active government. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am
The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands” • Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule” • Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding” • Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition” • Karl… [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:40 am
The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands” • Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule” • Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding” • Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition” • Karl… [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm
[v].) [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H.… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:15 am
In this article we distil critical lessons from the Federal Court’s recent decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd[1] and practical actions to be taken by Boards and executive management. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
On 23 March 2022 Steyn J heard an application in the case of QRT -v- JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
Indigenous Law A Promise Kept: The Muscogee (Creek) Nation and Mcgirt V. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Isabelle Buffard (Universität Wien - Law), James Crawford (Univ. of Cambridge - Law), Alain Pellet (l'Université Paris X-Nanterre - Law), & Stephan Wittich (Universität Wien - Law) have published International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
[h]e and the mother of the child were married at any time in the ten months immediately preceding the birth. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
[et al.].Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010.EuropeHM753 .R57 2010A community of Europeans? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am
” Roberts v. [read post]
