Search for: "Very v. Levy"
Results 101 - 120
of 853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am
The Directive and its recitals make it amply clear that the phrase should be interpreted very broadly. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am
The Directive and its recitals make it amply clear that the phrase should be interpreted very broadly. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 5:43 pm
” The docket sheet for the case, New York v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 10:36 am
A very interesting and important matter; go to Levy's post for more analysis, and more details on the arguments for and against each of these positions. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
On the first question, the committee is very likely on solid ground. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
Please shut the f*ck up about yourself and concentrate on the very real public health crisis engulfing Sandwell! [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
From Jackson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am
What follows is a very basic explanation of the rules and some issues surrounding arbitration of judicial dissolution claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
Fines levied in its prosecution were repaid by Act of Congress on the ground that it was unconstitutional…. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
If Washington had chosen to levy a tax on sales of stocks or bonds, such a stock transfer tax would be an excise tax, because it’s based on the transaction or activity. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:22 pm
Indeed, at the time of the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 landmark Marchand v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm
The saving (on what the developer owes Google) is just not going to make a difference.The same would happen in the U.S. if the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Smith v Daily Mail and Bartnicki v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Smith v Daily Mail and Bartnicki v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am
(The rule actually has to do with congressional districts, but it amounts to a very nearly population-based requirement.)So there is no such thing as an unconstitutional tax. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 11:30 pm
Ten years ago, in the famous EU Huawei v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
I then explained in more detail why the abandoned Lochner Court case (Eisner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
I then explained in more detail why the abandoned Lochner Court case (Eisner v. [read post]
