Search for: "Vines v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette reported how a leaked email from Sarah Vine to Michael Gove shows the influence that Rupert Murdoch and Paul Dacre have on UK politics, as she mentions that they ‘instinctively dislike Boris’ but trust Gove’s ability. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 2 June 2016, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Barron v Vines ([2016] EWHC 1226 (QB)). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am by INFORRM
He replied to the claimants’ letter before action in January 2015 stating that he wanted to “take the opportunity to clear up any misunderstanding“. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:47 am by INFORRM
 Damages are effectively capped at £275,000 for the most serious possible libel (see Barron v Vines [2016] EWHC 1226 (QB)) but, in practice, even after a contested trial awards rarely exceed £100,000. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 May 2016, Warby J heard an assessment of damages in the case of Barron v Vines. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Prince is best known as the artist behind the Lenz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:12 am by Andres
As stated above, he does not conclude on the intermediary liability section. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Los Angeles businessman has been rewarded one of the largest Internet defamation awards ever. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 23 February 2016 the assessment of damages in the UKIP libel case of Barron v Vines, was adjourned because the judge, Sir Michael Tugendhat, recused himself. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts There was an unsuccessful application to set aside judgment in Barron MP & Anor v Vines, heard by Sir David Eady on 16 February 2016. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals finds the plaintiff cannot state a claim that a school district retaliated against her for her public advocacy against the district.The case is Munoz-Feliciano v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am by David Post
The distinction is critical (and often outcome-determinative) because, as the Supreme Court of North Carolina put it in a recent case (State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:14 am by Martha Engel
  Innvopak had argued that the marks were dissimilar, stating that the WINEBUD mark was a play on vinebud or the bud of a vine and was therefore different in commercial impression than BUD. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Vine, Periscope, other new live streaming tech. [read post]