Search for: "WOODS v STATE FUND" Results 101 - 120 of 397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 3 to 5 July 2018, Nicklin J heard the remainder of the trial in Monir v Wood. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[£]  ICO Amid Government plans to introduce fines for company directors of nuisance call firms the ICO has issued a statement from Deputy Policy Commissioner Steve Wood. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
For a similar recent case from the neighboring state of Lousiana, also involving criticism of a judge during an election campaign, see Bartholomew-Woods v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Wood v Jaffer 2018 BCSC 85 Burnyeat J awarded damages for defamation in sum of $45,000 (including punitive damages of $10,000) in respect of allegations made by house owners to various trade bodies about a builder whose work they were dissatisfied with. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Federalist Society Review,  Jonathan Wood and Ilya Shapiro weigh in on Christie v. [read post]