Search for: "WOODS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 101 - 120 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 5:21 am by Stefanie Levine
Previously, the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief arguing that compositions isolated from nature, such as DNA, were not patent-eligible, but that related compositions such as cDNA, probes, primers, recombinant DNA, etc were patentable. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:21 am by Stefanie Levine
Previously, the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief arguing that compositions isolated from nature, such as DNA, were not patent-eligible, but that related compositions such as cDNA, probes, primers, recombinant DNA, etc were patentable. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
DeJesus KINGS COUNTYTorts Prior Assault Ruled Dissimilar in Nature, Did Not Put Department on Notice of Future Misconduct Abadia v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The petition in that case is Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am by William Ford
Sophia Brill argued that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) could clear up whether it was misled—as the Nunes memo alleges it was—by the FBI and the Justice Department when they sought orders to surveil Carter Page. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Nonetheless, at least on the thin motion-to-dismiss record before it, the court found no reason to depart from the state’s tort precedent by recognizing a new cause of action. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Mrs Clift called the police and the parks department. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion joined by Justice Breyer, and Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Alito joined. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
Quinta Jurecic flagged the Justice Department’s newly updated U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
” In other words: The Justice Department wants Trump released without requiring the payment of bail. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:13 pm
No, not if that was your weekend job and sat as a justice during weekdays on the Third Department, Appellant Division. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 pm by Matthew Kahn
” It references pending legislation considering the matter, notably the International Communications Privacy Act and a proposal from the Justice Department that evolved into the CLOUD Act. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Justice Saunders said that it was important that any costs order meet with public approval, especially given “the financial restraints the government is currently imposing on the justice system. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
C.F.K. and Marion County Department of Child Services - affirmed. [read post]