Search for: "Wagers v. Wagers" Results 101 - 120 of 438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2008, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division considered such "wearing two hats at the same time" in Holbrook v Rockland Co, 260 A.D.2d 437, and Nemani v United Health Services, Inc., 170 AD2d 782. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:13 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
So, dear readers, Clerquette notes sadly that the only tidbit to emerge from this day of diligent speculation, guesswork, and wagering is that Judge Sonia Sotomayor is now leading General Elena Kagan in the  ATL reader poll, which asks who (of the nine most popular putative candidates) should replace Justice Souter. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:13 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
So, dear readers, Clerquette notes sadly that the only tidbit to emerge from this day of diligent speculation, guesswork, and wagering is that Judge Sonia Sotomayor is now leading General Elena Kagan in the  ATL reader poll, which asks who (of the nine most popular putative candidates) should replace Justice Souter. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
But, outside the Roblox platform, there are a number of online casinos that take wagers in Robux. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
The targeted provisions of the AWA are contained in § 2156, which places restrictions on cockfighting and other "animal fighting ventures," defined as "any event, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, that involves a fight conducted or to be conducted between at least 3 animals for purposes of sport, wagering, or entertainment. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:51 am by Doug Cornelius
Alleges Poker Site Stacked Deck by Alexandra Berzon in the Wall Street Journal First Amended Complaint in US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am by Kevin Kaufman
The growth is a result of more states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
The relatively recent expansion of sports betting in the U.S. is a result of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:26 am
Experient Inc., Opposition No. 91190253 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark EXPERIENT for meeting, convention, exhibition, seminar, event, tradeshow, and conference services, in view of Opposer's alleged prior use of the identical mark EXPERIENT for event marketing and planning services].January 15, 2014 - 2 PM: Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]