Search for: "Walker v. Phillips"
Results 101 - 120
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
Lords Phillips and Clarke find that the claim falls within the scope of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 3(1)(a). [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There are two appeals in the Privy Council this week to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
(Lord Walker [193]) and Lord Phillips expressed his concerns as to the consequences of this “absolutism” if a minister&r [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
The appeal is due to be heard by Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
