Search for: "Wand v. State" Results 101 - 117 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2009, 7:37 am by Lee E. Berlik
In Virginia, courts must consider the following in determining whether specific jurisdiction should be asserted: "(1) the extent to which the defendant purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the State; (2) whether the plaintiffs' claims arise out of those activities directed at the State; and (3) whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction would be constitutionally reasonable" (citing Consulting Eng'rs Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:07 pm
The prior art disclosed blenders with structurally similar stirring wands that were used to break up or dislodge air pockets. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm
State) there's not a lot to keep the egos in check. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
  The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:09 pm
Page 13 cites Wands on predictability/unpredictability. [read post]