Search for: "Washington v. Direct Express" Results 101 - 120 of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:18 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 I am also working on a book manuscript in which the Institute has expressed interest. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
  Washington expressed no opinion whatsoever on the line between direct and indirect taxes. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by Aaron
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: In Re Personal Restraint of Francis: The Court held that there was a double jeopardy violation when Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
  On June 17, 2008, the long awaited opinion from the New Jersey Supreme Court in the case of Devaney v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
When reviewing evidence for sufficiency, circumstantial evidence and direct evidence carry equal weight. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
After its February 2008 decision in Riegel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:33 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
In a press release issued today, attorneys for a husband and wife tax fraud whistleblowers, expressed optimism that President Trump’s pick for Secretary of Treasury Steve Mnuchin would show support for the IRS Whistleblower Office by not appealing a the Tax Court’s decision in Whistleblower 21276-13W v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am by Richard Samp
But DHS has directed that DAPA applications are all to be processed at a central facility in the Washington area, thereby precluding face-to-face interviews. [read post]