Search for: "Waters v. Civil Service Board" Results 101 - 120 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
* For the purposes of  determining an individual's eligibility for an accidental disability retirement allowance pursuant to §363, in Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 57 NY2d 1010, the Court of Appeals defined the term accident as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary and injurious in impact. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The argument under Section 3513 is interesting, but it seems to me ultimately doesn't hold water. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
Plaintiff then filed a civil suit against the helicopter operator and eventually the lawsuit settled for $2.3 million. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
He sat down in the section reserved for white people, because the Black section was crowded and had water on the floor. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Schuyler Farms Limited v Nesathurai, the Health Services and Appeal Review Board reviewed an order made by the Medical Officer of Health of Haldimand Norfolk Health Unit for all employees and seasons workers, pursuant to s. 22 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
The country is struggling in the midst of civil war, famine, and a looming cholera epidemic. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Malibu (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1538: A Challenge to project’s construction impacts on hydrology and water was moot because the construction was complete. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
Roughly 650,000 civilians have also lost their access to water amid the fighting. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
McHughDocket: 10-638Issue(s): Whether the claims of a dual-status National Guard technician alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are jurisdictionally barred by the doctrine of Feres v. [read post]
The State Water Resources Control Board Releases Proposed Rule Modifying The General Permit For Suction Dredge Miners. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
  And, indeed, as an investor operating in the private sector, the ability of the Norwegian SWF to assert some considerable influence on the way in which the Duke Board responds to its responsibilities to respect hum ab rights, including the human rights associated with environmental degradation, should have been an important element in the Ethics Council's calculus. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
Therefore, summary judgment was appropriate.NFP civil opinions 1/22/08 (6): Jerry Terry, Dorman Hill, Barry Clevenger, et al v. [read post]