Search for: "Waters v. Civil Service Board" Results 101 - 120 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
State Water Resources Control Board and San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Amicus Brief Waters of the State Rulemaking Proceedings Pending Amendments to Riverside County Mining Ordinance Point San Pedro Road Coalition v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:48 am by Harper Batts and Chris Ponder
After issuing the GoPro decision, the Precedential Opinion Panel designated the Board’s decision in Infiltrator Water Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
Generally, the Court has deferred to its prior decisions under a doctrine called stare decisis, but, in Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Contrary to the Court’s meek disclaimer, it was not at all clear that the holding in El Apple applied across the board, as opposed to just the employment context, where Texas substantive law is an analogue to federal civil rights law, and perhaps a few other select areas of law. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 8:14 am by Joy Yusi
Benchers, who serve as the LSO's board or directors, fulfil a central role in the governance of Ontario lawyers and paralegals. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
What this study indicates, however, is that judges cited philosophers most often in criminal cases,[22] and only secondly in constitutional law cases.[23] Quantitatively, the third largest category was in “Civil Practice and Procedure”.[24] To assess the area of law for each case, the main subject heading assigned to each case by Carswell was used. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Under MCLA 213.62(1); MSA 8.265(12)(1), jury procedure in condemnation cases is governed by the same rules as are other civil a [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:06 pm by Berry Law Firm
After the VA initially denied the claim for service-connection, the Federal Circuit issued an order to hear the Procopio v. [read post]