Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 6:38 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted summary judgment to the Defendants in a property contamination claim. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm by Bryan West
  Lessons Learned Superior courts are confirmed to have jurisdiction to vacate a lien involving Crown land. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One petition for certiorari was filed on 9/12/22: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm by WIMS
There is no taking unless petitioner can show that, before the Florida Supreme Court's decision, littoral-property owners had rights to future accretions and contact with the water superior to the State's right to fill in its submerged land. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
E060038), the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate challenging an EIR for the Perris Dam Remediation Project. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Tribe) petitioned for review in superior court, challenging the validity of Ecology’s amended rule reserving the water. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
 The Plaintiff's claims were based on nuisance and negligence.Justice Heeney of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff's claim on the basis that the application of biosolids did not cause the Plaintiff's well to become contaminated. [read post]
Superior Court of Ventura County, employees worked on a vessel that provided maintenance services to offshore oil platforms located outside California’s boundaries. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:48 am by NARF
Examining the implications of Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:08 am
WalkerOn January 29, 2008, Judge Thomas Cahraman of the Riverside Superior Court ruled that CEQA did not require the Banning City Council to consider the Global Warming impacts of a project approved prior to the enactment of AB 32.In Highland Springs v. [read post]