Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
There has been obfuscation of what “waters of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:07 am
In Procopio v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 pm
It replaces the prior Obama Administration rule referred to as WOTUS- “Waters of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 3:21 am
Recent developments Whilst there is much in the news at the moment about the relaxing of the Jones Act in the aftermath of the recent (and on-going) hurricanes, we consider the financing risks of vessel modification outside the United States: The United States Jones Act limits the transportation of merchandise by water between points in the United States in vessels built in the United States, documented under the U.S.… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
United States, 126 S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
On January 2, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan issued an order to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:08 pm
The most recent such case, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
Environmental Protection Agency to determine whether they are waters of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
The origin of this doctrine was hammered out in a 1908 United States Supreme Court case, Winters v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:27 pm
United States (Rapanos)). [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 12:26 pm
United States. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:21 am
Specifically, the Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulatory definition of what constitutes “Waters of the United States” subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:10 pm
Acknowledging that the Corps and EPA had promulgated a new rule re-defining “waters of the United States” in 2015—which is now being challenged in the courts—the Court of Appeals noted that this case is controlled by the pre-2015 definition of “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:39 pm
16-299 that district courts have jurisdiction to hear challenges to any rule that attempts to define "Waters of the United States" for purposes of determining the scope of coverage of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:56 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:14 am
Traditionally, water has been abundant in the Eastern United States, and water transfers from one body of water to another were rarely a subject of dispute. [read post]