Search for: "Watkins v. Laws"
Results 101 - 120
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 5:14 am
Rebekka holds a PhD in Theoretical Physics from the Bonn University.Sven Völcker (Partner, Latham & Watkins):Dr Sven Völcker is a partner in Latham & Watkins' Global Antitrust & Competition Practice. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:42 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
FIESELER v. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
Posted by Andrew Clubok, Blair Connelly, and Matt Rawlinson, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Saturday, April 4, 2020 Editor's Note: Andrew Clubok, Blair Connelly, and Matt Rawlinson are partners at Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:42 am
Steel Corp., 856 F.2d 514, 521 n.8 (3d Cir. 1988)(observing that a employee cannot generally waive his rights under FLSA, but that he may be able to release a factually disputed claim); Watkins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
Supreme Court case about her grandfather: Watkins v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm
” At the Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler discusses Texas’s decision to retain Latham & Watkins in the case. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:21 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am
See Watkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 6:10 am
Editor’s Note: Brian V. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:05 am
M.J.B., 163 N.J. 200, 218 (2000) (citing Watkins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
” Accordingly, ruled the court, under the circumstances of this case, Watkins Glen is entitled to be defended and, if need be, indemnified by National Union Fire as a matter of law. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Most importantly it places her case in a history of LGBTQ rights litigation, including Watkins v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Daugherty and Watkins v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
See Katz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
The food product at issue in Watkins v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:11 am
Watkins, 367 U. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
Commentary comes from Jason Ritchie at The National Law Review, Trevor Burrus at Cato at Liberty, Michael Doyle at McClatchy, Greg Sargent at The Washington Post, Adam Feldman at Empirical SCOTUS, Daniel Hemel and David Louk at Medium, and Matthew Watkins and Neena Satija at The Texas Tribune. [read post]