Search for: "Watson v. Bear"
Results 101 - 118
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 8:21 am
Watson (1996), 108 C.C.C. (3d) 310 at 323-24 (Ont. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
But even if he had concluded that the statute was constitutional, that view of the case would have conformed to the widespread view that, under existing Supreme Court precedent, the Second Amendment did not confer a right to bear arms unconnected to service in a militia. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
After the furore about Tom Watson MP and others blocking government libel reform plans the other day it was ironic that the Court of Appeal handed down some serious common sense and justice the next day to get a grip on the runaway horse of libel law. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
Since one legal tests of trademark infringement is customer confusion, you be the judge: Are the marks confusing enough that customers might think products bearing them are from the same source? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:18 pm
That case, Watson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
Based on Griffiths v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Maybe not (Patent Baristas) (Managing Intellectual Property) General BioPharma royalties European Customs Utah and software – thoughts on les Nouvelles Jun 09 (IP Think Tank) Drop in R&D funding for HIV vaccine (Intellectual Property Watch) Balancing act: IP rights vs global public health goals (IP Osgoode) Doubly fake drugs kill patients, markets – China said to be flooding West Africa with fake medicines bearing ‘Made in India’… [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
” See Watson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
A party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that it has no other means of attaining the relief desired, Mallard v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz), US: Proposals for the approval of generic biologics under consideration: (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings), US: A paradigm shift in obviousness for pharma, biotech: (IP Law360), US: USPTO’s Bruce Kisliuk addresses ACI Pharma/biotech patent claim drafting and prosecution conference: (Patent Docs), US: New bill to provide biotech companies Sarbanes-Oxley relief: (California Biotech Law Blog), US: Biotech and pharma companies spent millions on lobbying in 2007: (Patent… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
How a team can throw 55 passes in a game, complete 26 and not score is one of the great mysteries of football and points to what must be some poor playcalling by the Bear coaching staff. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:24 am
The plaintiff bears the burden of proof as to both of these determinations. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:49 pm
Perhaps the most interesting decision was Hurley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:39 pm
What do you think, Watson? [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
Probably in no other way and no other time could she so effectively have brought the attention of millions to bear upon the cause. [read post]
