Search for: "Watts v. State.(2)" Results 101 - 120 of 292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Watt’s article Tyranny by Proxy: State Action and the Private Use of Deadly Force is cited in the following article: Michael Patty, Social Media and Censorship: Rethinking State Action Once Again, 40 Mitchell Hamline L.J. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:52 am
This piece considers Justice Leondra Kruger)Hanson Bridgett's Gary Watt offers Attorney fees are costs in trial court but not on appeal, about Stratton v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm by Chuck Cosson
Implied, but insufficiently stated in the article, is the fact that the “mindfulness technology” was invented by humans, in order to address a perceived market for tools to help resist distractions. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
One was the largest-watt station, generating the most revenue, another was the second-largest, and the third was a smaller station. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:58 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
” Watt, 50 M.J. at 105 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
In the same period, module prices declined from about $0.94/watt to about $0.39/watt. [read post]