Search for: "Wells v. Gillette"
Results 101 - 120
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The reader or hearer ought to be in a position to judge for himself how far the comment was well founded. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am
Updated – Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 - Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal to unanimously hold that the defence of fair comment should be open to a booking agent which said on its website that a Motown tribute band, the Gillettes, were “unprofessional”. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am
As the litigation proceeded, however, the case (as well as another individual filesharing case, Sony v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:37 am
" Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm
Summary of Decision issued August 4, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rice v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The Gillettes, Mr Joseph and two others, sued for libel. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:21 pm
The patentee in Aspex Eyewear Inc. v Clariti Eyewear, Inc. might have done well to heed my warning. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:04 pm
Gillette Co., 857 F. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:34 am
Perry, Judge.Representing Appellant Johnson: Kenneth DeCock of Plains Law Offices, LLP, Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:46 am
Winkler of Daly Law Associates, LLC, Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee CMS Oil & Gas Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm
Century 21 Top Realty; Throckmartin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
This list includes newly incorporated companies in Massachusetts (so-called "domestic corporations") as well as companies organized in other states that have filed to do business in Massachusetts (so-called "foreign corporations"). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:53 am
Summary of Decision issued August 21, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Johnson v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
Co. v Gillette Co. (64 NY2d 304 [1984]): "[W]henever an insurer wishes to exclude certain coverage from its policy obligations, it must do so in clear and unmistakable language. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
Unfortunately the remedial constructive trust is a much less well understood tool for the English lawyer. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
I. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:32 pm
We have been presented with no good reason why compensation should be paid in one instance and not in the other.Gillette v. [read post]
