Search for: "Wells v. James" Results 101 - 120 of 5,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2022, 2:00 pm by Eileen McDermott
James Edwards, a consultant to Centripetal and to amici Eagle Forum ELDF and Committee for Justice, as well as head of amicus, Conservatives for Property Rights, wrote on IPWatchdog last week that Centripetal and other amici hoped the High Court would take the case to clarify the judicial recusal statute. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Each section contextualises the application of copyright as well as discussing key issues and challenges, including the impact of the COVID pandemic, such as the inclusion of pandemic-specific contract clauses. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 11:37 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
For all of the intrigue of (alleged) six-figure tanking bonuses, and clumsily-arranged meet-cutes on James Bond villain mega-yachts, Flores et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:07 am
Thanks to James Beck, Esquire of the Dechert firm in Philadelphia for his efforts in pushing for these cases to be published on Westlaw.The recent trivial defect premises liability case has been given the following Westlaw citation:Melchiorre v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:00 am by Wells Bennett
So asks Judge James Pohl,  in an order he reportedly issued yesterday in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Entertainment Merchants Assn:JUSTICE ALITO: Well, I think what Justice Scalia wants to know is what James Madison thought about video games. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:04 am by INFORRM
James Heath of Atkins Thomson is Lead Solicitor for the Claimants in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
Planché v Colburn (1831)CHARLES MITCHELL AND CHARLOTTE MITCHELL5.Marsh v Keating (1834)JAMES EDELMAN6. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am by Aimee Hess
Continue reading → The post Royalty Interests and Antitrust: Waggoner v. [read post]