Search for: "Wells v. Unknown" Results 101 - 120 of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
 But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know.That's just a side benefit. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In a case such as this involving a public employee, Public Officers Law § 89 would require the disclosure of the employee's name (see Matter of Faulkner v Del Giacco, 139 Misc 2d 790,{**66 AD3d at 34} 794 [1988]"  "Third, if pre-action discovery or FOIL requests are not viable options, plaintiffs intending to pursue a "Jane Doe" defendant may commence their actions against any known codefendants, who may possess information identifying the unknown… [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
In Actavis v Lilly, Lord Neuberger was keen to follow Germany, which was subsequently watered down in Warner Lambert and, now, more so. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:26 am by Walter Olson
Tweet Tags: hot coffee, Stella LiebeckLiebeck v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
In this respect, the court can take account of the public interest in receiving information, as well as the rights of the parties. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
One day – well, it was almost daybreak anyway – my wife, Caroline Bradley, came into my study and asked if I'd been up all night on the computer again. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:57 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
On Monday, I (successfully) conducted my first non-compete trial since the Supreme Court of Illinois' decision in Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Commentary The Supreme Court’s decision will be closely scrutinised by representatives of the transport industry and passenger groups alike, and may well come to play an important role in the pending appeal in Thibodeau v Air Canada, soon to be heard by the Canadian Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:38 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Eric previously blogged about another The Cobbler enforcement suit that didn’t turn out well for the plaintiff. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
If his doubts are well founded, then the Oireachtas has it its power to amend the section to come into line with its intentions. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]