Search for: "Wells v. Walter" Results 101 - 120 of 992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 8:02 am
  In addition, another resource cited to the decision that is worth mentioning.First up, the well-run and informative Point of Law blog, edited by Walter Olsen, discusses the case today with a references to this blog. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, citing  Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, citing  Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:42 pm
By Mike Dorf During his acceptance speech for the 1984 Democratic Presidential nomination, Walter Mondale made the following statement: Whoever is inaugurated in January, the American people will have to pay Mr. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
LawSusan Bibler Coutin, Justin Richland, and Véronique FortinRepetition in History: Anglo-American Legal Debates and the Writings of Walter BagehotKunal M. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am by Gene Quinn
” That is clearly not what Monsanto is arguing, and that Justice Scalia called Walters on such a fallacious statement shows that he was well prepared and knowledgeable about the facts and claim. [read post]