Search for: "Wife B v. Husband B" Results 101 - 120 of 1,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The wife returned to work at JP Morgan in February of 2010, shortly before the husband was imprisoned. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The wife returned to work at JP Morgan in February of 2010, shortly before the husband was imprisoned. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 6:17 am
The emergency could be that their Husband/Wife is taking the furniture, going to turn off the electricity, or cancel the Husband's/Wife's car insurance. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
(b) Issue: Is the first wife entitled to half of the marital share of the husband’s retirement benefits? [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
  The Wife presented proofs at trial that demonstrated some of the Husband’s income, but she also successfully showed that the Husband had not complied with the Wife’s demand for discovery prior to trial. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 5:23 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
The trial court, on remand, was to reconsider: (a) An award to Wife of her attorney fees and cost of appraisals; (b) Whether the imputation of income to Husband of $130,000 annually rather than his actual compensation of $240,000/year and wife was appropriate or whether the trial court's imputation of income to Husband of only $130,000 was appropriate to avoid "double-dipping" since Wife was awarded one-half of the value of the… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:11 pm by G.A. Napier
In the Howard case, the ex-husband had agreed to be responsible for certain debts the ex-wife had also co-signed. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
L.B.B., decided yesterday by the N.J. appellate court, in an opinion by Judge Greta Gooden Brown joined by Judges Patrick DeAlmeida and Stephanie Mitterhoff, the plaintiff husband and defendant wife were getting divorced, and the wife claimed that the husband wasn't giving her a Jewish religious divorce. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:43 pm
This is a far reaching decision because, for instance, a second wife cannot now recover from her husband marital funds used to pay his first wife spousal maintenance or child support. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
  (b) Issue: Was the husband entitled to claim the challenged deduction? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In 1997, the Appellate Division affirmed the decision and held that the former husband forfeited any right to distributive awards due to his initial refusal to give his wife a Get (Schwartz v. [read post]