Search for: "Will Baude" Results 101 - 120 of 1,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am by SHG
Without regard to whether you accept or reject the argument proffered by Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, or even Larry Tribe and Judge Luttig, it leaves many questions unanswered. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:40 am by Jonathan H. Adler
., these posts by Steve Calabresi and Josh Blackman, Judge Michael Luttig's Twitter account, and this paper by Will Baude and Michael Paulsen.) [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:44 am by Dan Filler
Committed Commentators Payvand Ahdout, University of Virginia School of Law Will Baude, University of Chicago School of Law Zach Clopton, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law David Engstrom, Stanford Law School Nicole Garnett, Notre Dame Law School Dan Rodriguez, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Miriam Seifter, UW Law School and SDRI Co-Faculty Director Lauren Sudeall, Vanderbilt Law School Rob Yablon, UW Law School and SDRI Co-Faculty Director [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But I also agree with the Baude/Paulsen/Luttig/Tribe view that Griffin is relatively easy to overcome. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:27 am by Ned Foley
They accept the Baude-Paulsen position “about the continuing relevance of the Constitution’s insurrection clause,” but… Continue reading The post “Why Twisting The 14th Amendment To Get Trump Won’t Hold Up In Court” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, make the case that unless Congress grants Trump amnesty, he cannot run for or hold the office of the Presidency again because of his behavior surrounding the events of January 6th. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
  The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:14 am by Tom Smith
The evidence laid out by the legal scholars William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen in “The Sweep and Force of Section Three,” available as a preprint, is momentous. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
Ross Douthat has waded into the Section Three conversation, siding with Eric Segall against his fellow conservatives Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Despite the extensive research of Baude and Paulsen, their analysis ends where it began: Was January 6 an insurrection or rebellion? [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:29 am by Ned Foley
“First, although Baude and Paulsen’s originalism is honest and conscientious, originalists outside of… Continue reading The post Noah Feldman on section 3 & Trump appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 3:07 pm by Tom Smith
Last week, law professors William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 8:54 am by Ned Foley
Baude… Continue reading The post David French on Section 3 appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 9:30 am by Ned Foley
Judge Luttig and Larry Tribe in The Atlantic, agreeing with the Baude-Paulsen view of Trump’s disqualification under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment: “The disqualification clause operates independently of any such criminal proceedings and, indeed, also independently of impeachment… Continue reading The post “The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:57 am by Ned Foley
Times expressing strong disagreement with the Baude-Paulsen view of Trump’s disqualification under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment–and aligning himself with Michael McConnell’s and Eric Segals’s critiques of the Baude-Paulsen view: “My concern is that not… Continue reading The post “When the Law Is Not a Trump Card” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
That SSRN/Penn Law Review article by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen on DJT's disqualification under the 14th Amendment is getting some traction in the popular media (Time, NYT, The Conversation). [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 2:55 pm by Ned Foley
“Even before [the Baude-Paulsen article], liberal legal groups had begun researching state laws and working with voters who could challenge Trump’s access to the ballot. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:50 am by Ned Foley
Important Jason Willick column in the Washington Post on the perilous nature of disqualification politics: “Baude and Paulsen concede that their sweeping constitutional vision of disqualification-for-disloyalty could “perhaps” be “a little dangerous” for ‘First Amendment liberties of speech, press,… Continue reading The post “Trump triggers the politics of emergency” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
I have a draft paper responding to this argument, though I will be revising that in light of Trump's quadruple indictment and the Baude and Paulsen paper. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 11:12 am by Derek Muller
Rick H. links to a forthcoming article by Professors Michael Stokes Paulsen and Will Baude on Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, and specifically the application of that section to former president Donald Trump. [read post]