Search for: "William E. West" Results 101 - 120 of 886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The Guardian reports on the ongoing defamation claim between the West Australian premier, Mark McGowan, and Clive Palmer. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm by fjhinojosa
Murphy’s book Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works is cited in the following article: William J. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm by Brian Chase
America is fascinated and horrified by serial killers in equal measure. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Montgomery County officials are investigating Gino’s restaurant in West Norriton to determine if it is linked to the outbreak. [read post]
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, issue exhaustion under Public Resources Code section 21177, subdivision (e), does not apply to petitioner’s claims when there is inadequate notice necessary to provide an “opportunity for members of the public to raise…objections” to those claims. [read post]
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, issue exhaustion under Public Resources Code section 21177, subdivision (e), does not apply to petitioner’s claims when there is inadequate notice necessary to provide an “opportunity for members of the public to raise…objections” to those claims. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: The Tobacco Tax Equity Act would double taxes on cigarettes and equalize rates on all other tobacco and nicotine products to match the new higher cigarette rate. [read post]
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
 Pix Credit USA Today HERE As time moves further and further from the middle of the last century, and as the character of the events that determined the outcome of the last part of the wars that engulfed  Europe between 1914 and 1944 increasingly become history rather than  experience, one stands at that very brief point in history between living memory (and its immediacy) and and the recording of the memories of those no longer here (and its remoteness in virtually every respect). [read post]
In a prior proceeding, the Court denied PG&E’s motion to dismiss Clarke’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act claims and granted PG&E’s motion to dismiss Clarke’s claims under the CWA with leave to amend. [read post]
In a prior proceeding, the Court denied PG&E’s motion to dismiss Clarke’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act claims and granted PG&E’s motion to dismiss Clarke’s claims under the CWA with leave to amend. [read post]