Search for: "William T. Miller v. the United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
State legislatures, we [have] pointed out, performed an ‘electoral’ function ‘in the choice of United States Senators under Article I, section 3, prior to the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment,’ a ‘ratifying’ function for “proposed amendments to the Constitution under Article V,’ as explained in Hawke v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Together with Opinions in the Cases Decided at January Term, 1837, Arising on the Restraints on the Powers of the States (1837) Samuel Freeman Miller, Lectures on the Constitution of the United States (1891) William H. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal Unemployment… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
William Rollo, is a British officer). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Except that some lower courts don’t seem to understand it. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
United States for a significant step in its reasoning. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:18 pm
But were a court to hold that Google’s algorithms “know” my emails the way a human employee would—and, accordingly, that I no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy under United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Just because a work is in the public domain in the United States doesn’t mean it’s not protected by copyright elsewhere—and vice versa. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
