Search for: "Williams v. Blank" Results 101 - 120 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law writes in with the following comments on yesterday’s Clapper decision: The Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday in Clapper v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, Section 1201 Hearing Proposed Classes to be discussed: 7F. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
Avoiding Pitfalls When Moving eDiscovery to the Cloud – bit.ly/II2mMo (Philip Favro) Move Over Humans, 21st Century Document Review Has Arrived - bit.ly/IXZAlr (William Essig, Lawrence Del Rossi) N.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
According to the House of Lords decision in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416, Judge Birss had to decide: (a) whether there had been copying; (b) if yes to (a), which features had been copied; and (c) if yes to (a), whether the copying in (b) represents a substantial part of the original work. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  I’m trying to think of a test for allied offenses where they wouldn’t, and I’m pretty much drawing a blank… In State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm by Robert Chesney
  As such, he fits snugly into the ICTY’s first Joint Criminal Enterprise prong in Prosecutor v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel Four: Psychology of Online Advertising Moderator: Christopher Wong, Yale ISP Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy All new technologies get hailed as bringing democratization, but there are always multiple impacts. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Bexis
  But a lot of the time, we’ll get a standard, fill-in-the-blanks, form product liability complaint with a PMA device filled in. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit affirms Judge Ricardo Urbina’s decision in Hatim v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even assuming, arguendo, however, that we agree with defendants that the time within which plaintiffs could file a notice of appeal expired 35 days after the final Labor Law defendant had served the order dismissing the first complaint against the Labor Law defendants (see Blank v Schafrann, 206 AD2d 771, 773; Williams v Forbes, 157 AD2d 837, 838-839; Dobess Realty Corp. v City of New York, 79 AD2d 348, 352, appeal dismissed 53 NY2d 1054, 54 NY2d 754), we… [read post]