Search for: "Williams v. CCHS"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
Affirming summary judgment, the appeals court also agreed with the lower court that the employee failed to raise triable issues on her Title VII claims, because the only timely incidents of alleged discrimination were not sufficient to support harassment or constructive discharge claims (Williams v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
However, her failure to accommodate claim failed because an employer is not required to accommodate an employee that it merely “regards as” disabled (Williams v Baltimore City Community College, September 23, 2014, Russell, G, III). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:31 am
LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:49 am
Smith, June 28, 2016, Williams, A.). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 3:08 pm
It has been clearly very wrong ever since the Supreme Court's landmark 2004 ruling in CCH v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:38 am
Village of Orland Hills, August 11, 2016, Williams, A.). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:32 am
” In doing so, Congress deliberately sought to overturn Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:58 am
Affirming the district court’s judgment, the appeals court determined that probable cause had not existed for the officer’s arrest and that a reasonable official would have known that omitting pertinent information and including inaccurate information in an affidavit supporting the arrest warrant, in an effort to punish that officer, would violate clearly established constitutional rights (Williams v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
On June 27, the president nominated William J. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
: CCH Canadian Ltd., 2012 HJ 2055 C257 2012 The Federal budget : March 29, 2012 [Toronto, Ont.?] [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
Katz refers back to my blog on why the three-step test issue is a red herring and part of a “camouflage” to attack CCH v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:41 am
City of Berwyn, October 15, 2015, Williams, A.). [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
Affirming Rule 23 class certification in a dispute over whether Jani-King franchisees should have been classified as “employees” rather than independent contractors under Pennsylvania wage and hour law, the Third Circuit found that Rule 23’s commonality and predominance requirements were met because the misclassification dispute could be resolved by common evidence, including the franchise agreement, Jani-King manuals, and representative testimony (Williams v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:22 am
NLRB, November 6, 2015, Williams, S.). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
Levy, October 13, 2017, Williams, S.). [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:03 am
Indiana Department of Transportation, September 18, 2017, Williams, A.). [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:47 am
Trustees of Indiana University, August 31, 2017, Williams, A.). [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:45 am
The court also denied a motion to stay the proceedings pending approval of a settlement in a related state court action (Abernathy v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
Chief Justice Riley partially dissented, suggesting that there were triable issues as to the existence of an integrated enterprise (Davis v Ricketts, August 27, 2014, Shepherd, B). [read post]
