Search for: "Williams v. City and County of S. F." Results 101 - 120 of 297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(judgment for alleged assignee of credit card debt reversed and take-nothing judgment rendered)Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Struggling Real Estate Developers May Get Power To Tax You Along the lines of the strange and perhaps outrageous, there’s an article in the Dallas Morning News reporting that the Dallas City Council is considering (today 2/11/09) giving real estate developers the power to tax Dallas-Fort Worth residents. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
South Africa The Democratic Alliance federal chair Athol Trollip has won a R250,000 damages award from his former DA colleague and city councillor, Knight Mali, after the Grahamstown High Court ruled Mali had injured Trollip’s dignity and reputation with “patent untruths”. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Coble, as well as my student Sara Williams—so arguing, and urging the Ohio Supreme Court to hear the case (Rasawehr v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
One Parcel of Land in Prince George’s County,6 a federal district court found standing, noting that not only do the federal courts have a right to determine who among competing claimants is entitled to payments of compensation, but also that this the decision may be made as a preliminary matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
Reel Fantasy, 696 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1982)), as was “Batmobile” (DC Comics v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Rice, Thapar suppressed evidence found at the defendant’s home because “[i]f the suppression rule applies at all, it surely applies when one’s home is invaded without probable cause,” and the affidavit contained no evidence linking the suspected criminal activity to the defendant’s residence. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Don Cruse
NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS AND NUECES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, No. 17-0588 ROSENBERG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Strange, the defendants named in the proposed complaint are subject to potential liability for Reilly's alleged discriminatory conduct either vicariously or as aiders and abettors (seeAdministrative Code § 8-107[13][a]-[b]; Priore v New York Yankees, 307 AD2d 67, 74, 761 N.Y.S.2d 608 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 504, 807 N.E.2d 894, 775 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2003]; see also Malena v Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC, 886 F Supp 2d 349, 367 [SD… [read post]