Search for: "Williams v. Social Security Administration" Results 101 - 120 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Garcia that federal immigration law does not preempt a state prosecution for identity theft for using someone else’s Social Security number to obtain employment. [read post]
Databases at the Social Security Administration (SSA), to which Rodriguez had access as a TeleService representative. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 The neoliberal constitutionalism associated with William Howard Taft held that courts should protect rights of property and contract, the necessary engines of economic prosperity. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
After much national and international uproar at these blatant violations of human rights, the Supreme Court finally ruled five to three in Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Piepenbrock v London School of Economics and Political Science & Ors [2023] EWHC 52 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
ESG has always been a difficult topic to discuss, in large part because the three pillars – Environmental, Social, and Governance – are each so broad, especially so when take collectively. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Virginia – used the power of judicial review to raise the professional standards of American public administrators in the fields of education, law enforcement, electoral administration, and family law. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Plaintiffs brought the present action against defendant-appellee Michael Leavitt, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("defendant" or "the Secretary"), pursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:50 am by JB
Grant nominated two Republicans, William Strong and Joseph Bradley, who voted to reverse Hepburn in Knox v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Meanwhile, Gen Z is entering the workforce with new skillsets and expectations around technology use, work-life integration, and corporate social responsibility. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Reporters, columnists, and pundits almost unanimously agree that Project 2025 describes Trump’s plans for his next administration, despite his campaign’s effort to distance Trump from the Project’s recommendations.In a post on the social media site Truth Social, Donald Trump stated: I know nothing about Project 2025,And then: I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and… [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm by Unknown
Bruhl does not cite specific examples, but highlights of this impressive body of work include William Richman & William Reynolds, Injustice on Appeal(2012); Bert Huang, “Lightened Scrutiny,” 124 Harv. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletin has a piece on “Social media influencer advertising in Canada”. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 27 March 2023, Heather Williams J heard an application in the case of Kirk and Others v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
California, 10-10923, is likely being held for Williams v. [read post]