Search for: "Williams v. State of California (1983)"
Results 101 - 120
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Failure to Warn: CALIFORNIA APPEALS COURT BACKS DISMISSAL OF SURGICAL TOOL INJURY SUIT, Courtenay v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” Challengers argue that the law is impermissibly extraterritorial because virtually all the pork consumed in California is raised outside the state. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Beard, No. 07-3711 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit by prison inmates challenging the confiscation of legal materials by state corrections officials, dismissals of some claims and summary judgment for defendants on the remainder are affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs did not allege an actual injury in their claim of loss of access to the courts; 2) defendants demonstrated a legitimate governmental interest in stopping inmates from filing fraudulent liens and judgments against… [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Mich. 1983). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Bornhorst, No. 06-3729 "In a suit raising claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, and for state law malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, summary judgment for defendants on all claims is reversed in part where: 1) plaintiff's arrest for murder was unsupported by probable cause, and thus defendant-prosecutor was not entitled to qualified immunity; 2) the district court erred… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 09, 2008 Williams v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeals – First District, Division 1. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
State of California, 72 Cal. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
See William H. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
App. 1985); Williams v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
