Search for: "Wireless Stores, LLC"
Results 101 - 120
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:20 am
Law.com® 120 Broadway, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10271-1101 (877) 256-CIRC Customer Service Phone: (877) 256-CIRC © 2010 ALM Media Properties, LLC. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia set aside the FCC’s expansive interpretation of what constitutes an ATDS and its approach to consent of reassigned wireless numbers. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
AT & T Wireless Servs. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/wCzvR3JTCE -> "Insurer has duty to defend in alleged trademark counterfeiting case" http://t.co/68ITMApq8r -> Action for deceit for failure to pay royalties under a license affirmed in XY, LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:14 pm
Assertions that plaintiffs “overpaid for the products at Neiman Marcus because the store failed to invest in an adequate security system” or that the “loss of [customers’] private information, which they characterize as an intangible commodity,”[vi] constitutes an injury-in-fact were met with skepticism. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:37 pm
You shouldn’t leave your online store unlocked either. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
This year, Wyoming became the first state to legally recognize decentralized autonomous organizations, or DAOs, as a new form of LLC. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
I think not: (IP ThinkTank),European Commission launches consultation on ‘Content Online in the Single Market': (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IPR Helpdesk),Norway and Croatia join the European Patent Organisation: (IP Menu News),EU joins Hague system for the international registration of industrial designs: (Catch us if you can)IndiaNational Knowledge Commission calls for an overhaul of India's patent process:… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc., et al Issue: Whether, under the Copyright Act of 1976, Cablevision's on-demand service infringes the petitioners' exclusive copyrights by copying, storing, and transmitting its programs without an additional license. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
Cingular Wireless LLC, which involved the very same language that was at issue in Concepcion. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
” CTIA - The Wireless Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:59 am
Digital tool design and operation is naturally influenced by the biology, psychology, physical forms and other features of the humans that build and operate them.[2] For example, searchable text mirrors some of the information-management features of the human brain: short-term memory (words on the page) and long-term memory (researchable information stored on servers). [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
New PTAB Roadblocks & Strategies Earlier this week I laid out my Top 5 PTAB cases of 2020 for PTAB Practitioners, focusing on those cases that changed day-to-day practices before the agency. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
A PAN may include wired and wireless connections between devices. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Thresholds of Significance Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The primary focus is online transactions but not to the exclusion of how in-store transactions are routed, according to sources quoted by the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
(Mar. 25, 2013) [pdf]: This is an odd case where plaintiffs sought to hold wireless providers liable for allegedly infringing MMS messages transmitted through their systems. [read post]
