Search for: "Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation"
Results 101 - 120
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2008, 8:00 am
As announced by the EPO, this decision means that the patent applicant, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), will not be able to obtain European patent protection for their invention (dating back to 1998) relating to a process for obtaining stem cells from human embryos. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
– Marks & Clerk Biotechnology Report 2008: (IP finance), Pfizer and Daiichi-Sankyo’s bidding for Ranbaxy: (IP ThinkTank), (IAM), (Managing Intellectual Property), (GenericsWeb), Cutting Edge Information study reveals 53% of pharma patents approach expiration before litigation strategies are implemented: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), Quanta and agricultural biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Breakthough by WHO will give poor countries better access… [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:03 am
Nos. 5,843,780, 6,200,806, and 7,029,913, cover all embryonic stem cell research in the U.S. and are owned by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF). [read post]
18 May 2008, 11:54 pm
In the next month, the European Patent Office [EPO] will rule on whether inventions involving human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can be patented.Peter Ranscombe of the Scotsman reported:The enlarged board of appeal (EBA) of the EPO is due to meet in Munich on June 24 and June 25 to consider a patent application filed by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) in 1995.The application was initially rejected, but was sent to the EPO's technical board of… [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:53 am
A May 8 article in the North County Times stated:Invitrogen Corp. has deepened its involvement in the fast-growing field of embryonic stem cell research under a deal announced Thursday [May 8] with a holder of controversial patents to the technology.Carlsbad-based Invitrogen gets the legal right to sell products made by using embryonic stem cells, under the deal with the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation [WARF]. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:02 am
In an article Stem-cell patents confirmed; Victory for Wisconsin foundation in landmark ruling. in the 17 March 08 issue, Nature observed:An effort to overturn two contested stem-cell patents was quashed last week by the US Patent and Trademark Office, in a move that strengthens the position of the patents' holder, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF).See also ScienceToday on WARF victories over PubPat, FTCR [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 9:46 pm
§ 302-307) of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) stem cell patents -- Control No. 90/008102 for U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:39 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) came down on the side of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) in upholding one of its patents on human embryonic stem cells. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 6:36 am
Patent and Trademark Office has upheld challenges by consumer advocates to three over-reaching patents on human embryonic stem cells and rejected patent claims by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) said today. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 11:40 pm
The reporting of AP in the matter of the "action closing prosecution" for the re-examination of WARF's US 7,029,913 patent on stem cells was garbled:The patent office said last year it was preparing to toss out all three patents but the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, which holds the patents, appealed. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Patent Baristas),Vietnam : new developments in patent protection for medical uses: (Patent Docs),Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation licenses stem cell patents to BioTime: (IPBiz)Pharma & Biotech - ProductsFloxin (Ofloxacin) –US Supreme Court declines Daiichi Sankyo’s request for appeal of CAFC decision reversing Daichii’s initial win in its ofloxacin patent infringement case against Apotex: (IP Law360),Galvus… [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 2:21 pm
., the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation is going after a familiar adversary. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:49 am
Of the real WARF, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, the suit against Intel shows that WARF will go after someone when there is real money involved. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 9:05 am
The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation sued Intel for patent infringement, charging that the Core 2 Duo infringes on a patent granted to University of Wisconsin at Madison researchers in 1998 for a processor design that can break instructions into separate strands for more efficient processing. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:26 am
PGR, in creating a review MORE EXPENSIVE than re-examination, would become a tool to victimize smaller patent holders.Also, one notes on Feb. 7, CNET reported:The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation [WARF] sued Intel on Wednesday [Feb. 6] for patent infringement, charging that the Core 2 Duo infringes on a patent granted to University of Wisconsin at Madison researchers in 1998 [US 5,781,752] for a processor design that can break instructions… [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:10 pm
Earlier, in Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:08 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this month, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) announced that it had entered into a licensing agreement with BioTime, Inc. for 173 of WARF's human embryonic stem cell patents and patent applications (commonly known as the Thomson patents for inventor James Thomson). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
Burst.com case, which involves Apple paying a one-time, $10 million licensing fee: (ArsTechnica), (Copyfight), (Patent Prospector), Committee report will give clearer picture of the state of play at the USPTO: (IAM),Altitude Capital Partners sues Google, Yahoo, AOL and others: (Patent Prospector), (IPLaw360), Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal brought by a California software company against Viacom Inc. involving alleged trademark infringement: (IPLaw360), Injunction deals another blow to… [read post]
