Search for: "Wolff v. Wolff" Results 101 - 120 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
In response to public outcry, the order instead requires the secretary of homeland security to detain immigrant families together “to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations” and directs the Justice Department to amend the consent decree reached in Flores v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Given especially that Elting was granted a TRO, the payroll access misstatements, which we have determined to be immaterial, “were not sufficiently egregious to support this claim” of § 487 violation (Mintz v Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP, 53 Misc 3d 132{A} [App Term 1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:04 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) has published the abstracts for the Congress online, including the following ones concerning nanomaterials: “Update of potential hazards of nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte, I Iavicoli; “Overview — update of potential hazards of engineered nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte; “Noninvasive biomonitoring of 3 groups of nanomaterials workers with elevated markers of oxidative stress and inflammation,” by D Pelclova,… [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
See Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 108 (2008) (quoting Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch. 222, 232–33 (NY Ch. 1832)). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
Rather, the right to do so in New York derives from common law as recognized in 2008 by New York’s highest court in Tzolis v Wolff. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This is insufficient to make out a claim under Judiciary Law§ 487 (see Mintz v Rosenberg, Mine, Falkojf & Wolff, LLP, 53 Misc 3d 132(A), 2016 NY Slip Op 51388[U] [App Term, pt Dept 2016] [“The allegations that defendants filed a certificate of merit and/or a note of issue in the prior action when they lacked sufficient supporting medical expert opinion were not ‘sufficiently egregious’ to support (a Judiciary Law§ 487) claim”]). [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Tzolis v Wolff indicates that the Court is not necessarily opposed to finding new common-law remedies for LLCs so long as not expressly prohibited by statute. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:13 am by UKSC Blog
symposium Volume 8 of the Yearbook features a symposium titled Firing the Brexit Bullet – Who Pulls the Article 50 Trigger with 8 contributions from prominent commentators who closely followed or were involved in the Article 50 (‘Brexit’) case, Secretary for Exiting the European Union v R (Miller) [2017] UKSC 5. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:28 pm by Firemark Law Team
AND HE (AJIT PAI) GETS HIS NET NEUTRALITY action CHALLENGED HOTEL CALIFORNIA HAS SETTLED (Quick Take/follow up) COMICON CLASH CONTINUES COMMODORES TRADEMARK LAWSUIT AMAZON FIGHTING PIRACY (FOLLOWUP TO KODI and Over-The-Top Services (episode # 85) Entertainment Law Update is sponsored by LawPay   WOLFF V. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 10:13 am by David Post
Wolff in connection with the Book violated several provisions of Mr. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals in Bellwether Community Credit Union v CUSO Development Co., LLC where, under similar circumstances, the court held that the operating agreement’s terms superseded statutory buyout rights upon the minority member’s withdrawal. [read post]