Search for: "Wood v. May" Results 101 - 120 of 2,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2019, 7:33 am by Giles Peaker
  The post If you go down to the woods today appeared first on Near [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:36 am
 The court begins its opinion by explaining thatAppellant, Meri Jane Woods, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on December 15, 2014, as made final by the denial of Appellant's post-sentence motion on May 19, 2015. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
The date of the certification of the candidate for appointment rather than the date a candidate's name is reachable for appointment controls Matter of Woods v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 9:14 am by Will Baude
But Woods may be more noteworthy for a minor formatting innovation. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:13 pm by Erin Miller
Below, Tiffany Cartwright, a student at Stanford Law School, analyzes the opinion in Wood v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
13 May 2008, 12:19 pm
But Justice Woods is correct that you are indeed allowed to have admiralty claims in state court in limited circumstances under the savings to suitors clause. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
In part, while there may be questions as to Representative Wood’s sobriety, the testing methods, the stop and police procedures, the questions that Representative Wood seeks to set right are of grave importance to every citizen of Wisconsin, and across the U.S.: every person in the United States has a right to privacy that no police officer should violate.The officer who testified at Wood’s hearing admitted that the procedure used in… [read post]