Search for: "Woods v. Grant et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
In my discretion, I have accepted this recording into the record.Turning to the merits, a board of education has broad authority to prescribe the course of study in the schools of the district (Education Law § 1709 [3]; Appeal of McLoughlin and Carusi, 44 Ed Dept Rep 336, Decision No. 15,191; Appeal of Murphy, et al., 39 id. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The IRS correctly determined that it did not have the authority to and did not grant a second six-month extension. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Any court that is home to legal luminaries like Posner, Easterbrook, Wood, et al. must be fairy formidable. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Triumpho, Respondent, vCounty of Schoharie et al., Appellants. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Triumpho, Respondent, vCounty of Schoharie et al., Appellants. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Massachusetts in 1944 to Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
Health and Human Services Secretary et al. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:44 pm
" [1] Woods v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:44 pm
" [1] Woods v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
Expect Texas, et al., to really hone their State Farm arguments on remand. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit rejected this argument, following its decision in Wegman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit rejected this argument, following its decision in Wegman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit rejected this argument, following its decision in Wegman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit rejected this argument, following its decision in Wegman v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
The original injunction was granted in the case of FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Howe Freightways Inc., et al., 2019 IL App (1st) 172459 (Aug. 26, 2019). [read post]
