Search for: "Word v. Jones" Results 101 - 120 of 1,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
This form of words was very like the version which failed in 2013 but with the most offending word therein, “predominant”, removed. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
” Who wrote these majestic opening words of the Constitution? [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
It is for that reason that a prof neg claim arising out of a PI claim does not qualify as a claim for personal injury for the purpose of QOCS, or indeed for any other purpose such as limitation; Jones v GR Smith & Co (8 February 1993, unreported, CA). (7) By r44.13(1)(c) QOCS does not apply to applications for pre-action disclosure. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is, they deal not with the general question, “What’s the best way to interpret these words? [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am by Emma Kent
As a reminder… ‘Obvious & gross’ In the case of Wachtel v Wachtel [1973], the issue of conduct was considered by the family court and further summarised by Lady Hale in Miller [2006] as follows:“[…] once the assets are seen as a pool, and the couple as equal partners, then it is only equitable to take their conduct into account if one has been very much more to blame than the other: in the famous words of Ormrod J in Wachtel v Wachtel… [read post]