Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2013, 11:06 am
Nikki explains the case as follows (with links added by the IPKat):"In short, the defendant’s use of the words “Ideal Home” in connection with a show or exhibition goes back to 1908, when Lord Northcliffe’s newspaper launched its Daily Mail Ideal Home Exhibition. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
Judgment Lord Neuberger MR delivered the sole judgment. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
[From the website of the University of Cambridge Faculty of Law.]This term the Centre for English Legal History will be hosting four seminars:27 January - David Waddilove (St Catherine’s College, Cambridge) on ‘The legal basics of early-modern lending’10 February - David Ibbetson (University of Cambridge) on ‘Words and deeds: the action of covenant, again’24 February - Nicola Murphy (National University of Ireland, Galway) on ‘Derry v Peek in the… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
” In other words, the assessment of reasonableness is a function of whether one parent has a right to remain, but the other parent does not or whether neither parent has the right to remain. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
Part of the reason for this is the defence’s origins, which lie in times when Lord Walker says that the written word was only placed before and valued by “a relatively small educated and socially elevated class” [130]. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
The Supreme Court appeal was heard by a panel of five Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
The Lord Advocate also addresses the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session in Keatings v Advocate General.3 That case was raised by a pro-independence campaigner who asked the Court of Session to provide several declarators that the Scottish Parliament was able to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
Accordingly, the statutory language of s. 133 is almost identical to the wording of Article 14(6). [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
That this is the case is demonstrated by Katfriend and occasional contributor Dorothea Thompson, in this guest piece below:The Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Arden, Lords Justices Kitchin and Lloyd Jones) has confirmed that a definition’s express wording cannot be displaced by language elsewhere in the contract. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
In the Court of Appeal Lord Neuberger MR delivered the sole judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
At the end of July, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In that judgment (with which both Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson agree) the Court carefully reviews the history of Wilkinson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:51 am
” Better Courts Now complains that Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
The scope of the claim was thus rendered uncertain (in Lord Justice Floyd preferred wording) or ambiguous (in Lord Justice Lewison’s preferred wording). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
Part of the reason for this is the defence’s origins, which lie in times when Lord Walker says that the written word was only placed before and valued by “a relatively small educated and socially elevated class” [130]. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:55 am
By Dennis Crouch HTC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:46 pm
In giving the lead judgement in the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Moore-Bick, quoted extensively from the judgment of Lord Justice Diplock in Tappenden v Artus (Tappenden v Artus [1964] 2 Q.B. 185). [read post]
