Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
According to the House of Lords on Twitter, the answer is 34; the word was supercalifragilisticexpialidocious and was said by Lord McNally in 2011. 15. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
In In re Dolly Varden Chocolate Co., decided in 1924, the Court reiterated that “the words ‘Merrie Christmas’ [do] not to constitute a valid technical trade-mark for ribbon. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
In other words, it was a Tuesday. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:52 am
However, ‘correct’ is surely the operative word. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Those words equally apply to statesmen and stateswomen of all nations. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 10:05 am
To go back to Lord Neuberger’s words at paragraph 23 of Arnold v Britton, these are not obligations that clearly belong in this clause. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 1:33 pm
The name of the case is Thorner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In the didactic genre (or subgenre), “mirrors for princes,” philosophers instruct kings and princes how to rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
From Corso Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
The modern English law aversion to imposition of formalities was pithily encapsulated in an official committee report of 1937, describing the Statute of Frauds: ““'The Act', in the words of Lord Campbell . . . 'promotes more frauds than it prevents'. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
The AG’s opinion certainly reads like he closely studied, and perhaps sought inspiration from, Lord Leggatt’s leading judgment in Lloyd v Google (see our analysis of that decision here). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
Temur v Hackney LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 877 applied. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The Lord Justices of the House of Lords stated in the case of Ranger v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 1:50 pm
ShareIn Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
In other words, on Mostyn J’s analysis, there is no need for the principal reform heralded by the President’s October 2021 Report. [read post]
