Search for: "Wraggs v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Their involvement was clearly stated on the front page of the Court of Appeal judgment and they must be concerned about the potential damage to their reputation so casually inflicted by Hain’s action. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
We had a post by Paul Wragg suggesting that action could be brought against him. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
Matters would be different if the decision in ABC v Telegraph Group concerned a permanent injunction or if the resolution of the full trial had raised serious matters of legal principle. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:20 pm
This distinction is not clearly established in the preliminary hearing in Appleby v BBC and Guardian (not that it needed to be). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
Here, though, it is a question of horizontal (person to person) rather than vertical rights (state to individual). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Dr Paul Wragg, Editor in Chief, Communications Law, Associate Professor of Law, University of Leeds, Associate Academic Fellow, Inner Temple [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Wragg’s post is here. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
We had a news item about the judgment and a discussion of the dissenting judgments by Paul Wragg. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 11:38 pm
In this sense, Barbulescu v Romania can be explained without specific reference to human rights. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm
Dr Paul Wragg is an Associate Professor of Law and the University of Leeds. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm
Dr Paul Wragg is associate professor in law, University of Leeds and UK academic fellow of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple, London. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm
Dr Paul Wragg is a lecturer in law at the University of Leeds and an academic fellow of the Inner Temple. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Chris Torrero was the first of a number of folk to prod this Kat into writing about the Myriad gene patent ruling in the Unites States. [read post]
