Search for: "Wray v. AT" Results 101 - 120 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 4:15 am by familoo
Ricketts too is now “on the radar” in the Family Court, particularly since the case of London Borough of Islington v Al Alas and Wray [2012] EWHC 865 (Fam), which was major news in April 2012 (exactly the time the care proceedings were likely to have been commenced in this case) and really raised the profile of rickets as a potential cause of injuries that might otherwise be thought suspicious. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by KC Johnson
Indeed, the brief notes that one case on which Durham relied (Wray v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes   McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild   Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw  Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins  Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester Mackesys… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am by sally
“The recent case of LB Islington v Al Alas and Wray, (where I was led by Ian Peddie QC [also of Garden Court Chambers] in representing the father, Rohan Wray) should have some pretty significant implications in cases involving alleged non-accidental injuries.” Full story Garden Court Family Law Blog, 23rd April 2012 Source: www.gcfamily.wordpress.com [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 2:03 am by familoo
By now the press are reporting widely the case of Alas Al-Wray (FD10C00445 LB of Islington v Al Alas and Wray Approved Judgment 19 April 2012). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:41 am by elemembers
Case reference: Ms S Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd A worker who is sleeping on premises and ‘on call’ may well be working during that time for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations which has an impact on other statutory entitlements such as how holiday leave is accrued. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:41 am by elemembers
Case reference: Ms S Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd A worker who is sleeping on premises and ‘on call’ may well be working during that time for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations which has an impact on other statutory entitlements such as how holiday leave is accrued. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:16 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Plaintiff could not establish the important but/for causation - that, but for the attorney's negligence the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying lawsuit.As the Court noted:To establish the element of causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Saver, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v Lecci, 63… [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by Suzanne Lambert
The nature of the balancing exercise has been the subject of lengthy judicial consideration at the highest level of domestic courts (see, for example, R(Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 and Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11) and it is right that the interest to be balanced against that of Mr Ibrahim and his family is that of the general public or society, not of individual members of it. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:17 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RMM v HW & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1467 (17 December 2010) Quinn v CC Automotive Group Ltd (t/a Carcraft) [2010] EWCA Civ 1412 (16 December 2010) Warren v Calzaghe [2010] EWCA Civ 1447 (16 December 2010) Southern Cross Healthcare Co Ltd v Perkins & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1442 (16 December 2010) Benedetti v Sawiris & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1427 (16 December 2010) Revenue and Customs v Blue Sphere Global Ltd… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  " To establish causation, "a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer's negligence" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Kuzmin v Nevsky, 74 AD3d at 898; Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; Carrasco v Pena & Kahn, 48 AD3d… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by John Buford
Wray: A letter written by a physician who was served both individually and as registered agent for an LLC served as an answer for the physician only, not for the LLC. [read post]