Search for: "YOUNGER v. THE STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 1,909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 10:25 am by Josh Blackman
These dynamics present almost the opposite of Younger immunity–the federal court would be required to halt the state court proceeding. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:00 pm by Verónica Gonzales-Zamora
ShareKevin Younger was detained before trial at a state prison in Baltimore, Maryland. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning and thank you, [Columbia Law School] Dean [Gillian] Lester, for the introduction. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:37 am by Heather Douglas
“Evidence suggests that payment does change male willingness to donate, especially among younger donors. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
United States Koreans Becoming Younger – Unification of Age-Counting Systems Congress.gov January 2023 New, Tip, and Top Syndication Regulation and TV’s Big Three: Broadcasting Regulations and 1970s Television The Global Legal Monitor is our online publication covering legal news and developments worldwide. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 am by Shane Peagler
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California in another case involving against Snapchat related to its Speed Filter – Lemmon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:58 pm by Michael Oykhman
R v SG stated that an invitation occurs when the accused asks for permission to touch the victim or if the accused asks the victim to touch the accused. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:13 pm by Amy Howe
Younger, involving whether, to preserve an issue for an appeal, a party must reassert a purely legal argument rejected at summary judgment in a post-trial motion; Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]