Search for: "Young v. Russell" Results 101 - 120 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 12:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
[Disclosure:  Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the university during the Supreme Court proceedings in this case. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
When Dual-Class Stock Met Corporate Spin-Offs Posted by Geeyoung Min (Columbia Law School) and Young Ran (Christine) Kim (University of Utah), on Friday, May 3, 2019 Tags: Agency costs, Agency model, Dividends, Dual-class stock, IPO Spinning, IPOs, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Reorganizations, Shareholder voting, Spinoffs Aiming Toward the Future Posted by Tami Groswald-Ozery, Harvard Law School, on Friday, May… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:40 am by Emma Durand-Wood
On their BC Injury Lawyers Blog, Waterstone Law lawyers wrote about the importance of maintaining a pain journal after a car accident, and the responsibility of drivers towards young passengers, in light of the recent decision in Vedan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In an op-ed for The Hill, Elliot Mincberg warns that in The American Legion v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Young, 2019 ONSC 326 the plaintiff was a doctor who had written to a local newspaper. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions After a number of hearings going back to February 2008, Simpson J in New South Wales gave a 743 paragraph judgment in the case Michael Megna & Russell Lloyd v David Marshall & Richard Tory [2010] NSWSC 686. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 8:59 pm
Madam Justice Russell awarded the Plaintiff $104,500 for her non-pecuniary damages. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
Lewis (granted and consolidated with two other cases, Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Russell (finding that different penalties for similar amounts of crack and cocaine violated Minnesota’s Equal Protection Clause); Ravin v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell and Akin Gump are counsel to the mother in this case.] [read post]