Search for: "Young v. Simpson"
Results 101 - 120
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
Young, T. [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:39 am
In the famous Simpsons episode, Marge v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
Columbia Dean Fills Simpson Thacher Pro Bono Position
New York Law Journal
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has recruited a Columbia Law School dean to fill a newly created pro bono counsel position. [read post]
13 May 2008, 3:00 am
The same hard drive had four pictures of young girls who were obviously under the age of eighteen. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Young of Kenneth A. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
Frank points to Pagliolo v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
The ruling came in the case of Snyder v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
Simpson's criminal trial) and Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer's First Case: United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:52 pm
Simpson: This is a case that implicates the confrontation clause and Crawford. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:19 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:56 am
[Note 57: 1 De Montigny v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:05 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit reversed an appalling dismissal of a Title IX sexual harassment case, Simpson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:03 pm
That experience provided the basis for his first book, “Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer’s First Case — United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
At Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, each partner grosses about $2.4 million profits annually. [16] Even at this pay scale, apparently it is still a great deal to ask someone to forgo a personal hit of $40,000 to $70,000 per year. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
If they functioned the way the cost-plus crowd hypothesizes, I could afford my own Gulfstream V, Provence villa, and 5-bedroom penthouse with Central Park views: After all, I just increased my "costs," so the workings of the market would appropriately subsidize me on the wage side, right? [read post]
