Search for: "Young v. State of California" Results 101 - 120 of 1,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Alexandra Walsh
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Carrington viewed law schools as more akin to seminaries than to detached academic departments, and the role of seminaries is indeed to maintain the faith by teaching its premises to the young. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 am by Shane Peagler
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California in another case involving against Snapchat related to its Speed Filter – Lemmon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cahn, The Court’s Morality Play: The Punishment Lens, Sex, and Abortion, (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming).From SmartCILP:Samuel A. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court resolved the issue in California Federal Savings v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School and Brigham Young University- J. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am by William B. Gould IV
At the time I came to LSE as a young student there was a sharp difference between teaching and learning there and the intellectual environment in law school in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]