Search for: "Young v. Wilson" Results 101 - 120 of 344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
  There was a post on the Brett Wilson media law blog. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  These pirate sites have no intention of subjecting themselves to the jurisdiction of U.S. courts but want the benefits of U.S. law, all the while marketing themselves in the U.S. in direct competition with the creators, including creators, whose works they steal.[10] The digital pirates’ fascination with creating these offshore “pirate utopias” (or “Temporary Autonomous Zones” or “TAZ”) dates back to the 1991 hacker’s handbook by the anarchist… [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
As – in the grand scheme of things – a young and innovative court, it is valuable to get an insight into how the IPEC Small Claims court is used. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 12:16 am by Tessa Shepperson
  In rural areas and cities alike, the story is the same: young adults can’t afford to settle down in the areas they grew up in. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson blog had a post “ICO hands down its first fine under the GDPR”. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 3:54 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Wilson dismissed that assertion and is allowing the case to move forward with Unsworth classified as a private citizen. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  The Brett Wilson blog had a post as did 5RB. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
He says Lord Drummond Young’s view, in relation to the sittings of Parliament in that Act was limited to Northern Ireland was wrong. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
Introduction  In these joined appeals, the Supreme Court considered whether the “revised benefit cap” – the effect of which is to restrict the maximum amount of benefits payable to couples and lone parents to £23000 in London and £20000 elsewhere – discriminated against the lone parents of young children, and against the children themselves. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  There was a statement in open court [pdf] and pieces about the case on the Brett Wilson Media Law Blog and in the Press Gazette. [read post]