Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 101 - 120
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am
Defendants failed to meet their initial burden on those parts of the motion concerning those claims (see Pignataro, 38 AD3d 1320; see generally Zuckerman, 49 NY2d at 562). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
In light of these triable issues of fact, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
At this blog, Professor Steve Vladeck analyzes Elgin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
In any event, those writings are not acknowledged as required by CPLR 4538 and, thus, do not qualify as evidentiary proof in admissible form (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:51 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:12 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:51 am
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:51 am
Defendants, however, failed to establish as a matter of law that the complaint in the ECWA action would have been dismissed on that ground (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
In opposition to the motion, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the continuous representation doctrine applied to toll the statute of limitations (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Bygrave, Ian Lloyd, Stephen Saxby, International Association of IT Lawyers, Computer Law and Security Review (CLSR), Vol. 27, pp. 223-231, 2011, UNSW Law Research Paper No. 50 ‘Law and the Open Internet’, Adam Candeub,Michigan State University College of Law, Daniel John McCartney, Michigan State University College of Law, Federal Communications Law Journal, Forthcoming, MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-22 ‘International Bloggers and Internet Control‘, Hal Roberts,… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:09 am
Zuckerman, 388 Mass. 8, 12-15 (1983); Informix, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co., 55 AD3d 879, 880-881), and defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:08 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am
") (internal quotation marks omitted); Zuckerman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm
Carpenter & Zuckerman et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:25 pm
Co. of Am., 906 F.2d 1525, 1526 (11th Cir.1990).Zuckerman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm
Symposium Dinner"Why Batson Usually Does Not Work" - Stephen BrightFriday, October 21, 2011 - SymposiumThere will be three panels discussing Batson v. [read post]
