Search for: "*/**u.s. v. May" Results 1181 - 1200 of 54,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2015, 11:56 am
I didn't know that you could be convicted in federal court by an 11-person jury. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:10 pm
You reside -- and are hanging out -- in Wasilla, Alaska. [read post]
25 May 2007, 7:33 am
Fifteen informed, incredibly well-educated judges, each of whom reads -- and the majority of whom sign onto -- the majority en banc opinion. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
When the Ninth Circuit summary of the opinion itself spans to the seventh page of the slip opinion, you know you're going to be reading a long opinion. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:36 pm
I assume this means that members of the Yakima tribe don't have to pay stop at highway toll booths either. [read post]
31 May 2013, 10:13 am
My sense is that I wasn't the only one who thought (as I said here) that the dissent had the better of the argument in this one.The Ninth Circuit just took the case en banc.It's largely a fact-specific case. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:07 pm
Last year, the day the original panel opinion came out, I said that I thought the dissent by Judge Noonan was nothing short of a masterpiece. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
I agree with Judge Wallace.They validly stopped you because your plates expired. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:41 pm
Add today's opinion to the legion of statutory interpretation cases about whether "and" means "and" or "or".For the record:  For this statute, the panel says it means "and". [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:31 am
When we think about criminal statutes that governing obtaining money by fraud, we generally have an idea that they cover someone getting money for themselves. [read post]
22 May 2008, 10:40 am
I'm at the federal penitentiary in lovely Fort Dix, New Jersey today -- for hours rather than a judicially-established number of months, fortunately -- but should be able to bop my head in from time to time to catch up with whatever happens today. [read post]
30 May 2019, 11:07 am
There's little doubt that the Ninth Circuit gets this one right as a matter of legal doctrine. [read post]
27 May 2021, 11:23 am
Judge Smith makes a variety of unremarkable -- indeed, correct -- legal and factual assertions in this morning's Ninth Circuit opinion. [read post]