Search for: "A T"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 881,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2017, 6:46 am
Thus, these aspects distinguish the present case from that underlying decision T 748/91, cited by the appellant, in which the disclosure of the original application as a whole was held by the deciding Board to provide the skilled person with a discernible and reproducible technical teaching to extract a size ratio from the schematic drawings.3.3 For the reasons given above, the subject-matter of claim 1 of all requests extends beyond the content of the application as filed, contrary to… [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
. 'With regard to the conditions that the disclaimer meets the requirements of clarity and conciseness and does not remove more than necessary to restore novelty, both explicitly indicated in G 1/03 (see headnote, points 2.2 and 2.4), the Board concurs with the positions expressed in T 2130/11, points 2.9 and 2.10*. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
See T 670/95 [2], T 413/02 [3]. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
As stated in decision T 730/05 [3.2, last sentence] and in decision T 1554/05 [2.1, penultimate sentence] “the other relevant cases of which the board is aware, dealing mainly with the question of whether an applicant is allowed to resile from its indication of background art, either implicitly or explicitly take the view that, if not resiled from or clearly not prior art for other reasons, it may be relied upon as prior art (see T 654/92, T 691/94,… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
[…]Decision T 2017/07[1.7] Basically (sinngemäß) this view was also held in decision T 2017/07. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
When sloppy drafting meets thoughtless amendments, the outcome may be deadly.The appeal was against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to revoke the patent for lack of novelty.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:A cartridge (1) for use in a beverage preparation machine, the cartridge containing one or more beverage ingredients (200) and being formed from substantially air- and water-impermeable materials, wherein the one or more beverage ingredients is a liquid chocolate… [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
Reference is made to T 1143/06, as well as to T 1741/08, from this board in a different composition, which discusses the case law in this area, including the case cited by the appellant in the grounds of appeal, T 643/00. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
He further referred to decision T 962/98 to illustrate that an intermediate generalisation (from solar panel to power supply) could be admissible under A 123(2). [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
If the applicant maintains his request for amendment, the application has to be refused under A 97(2), since there is no text which has been approved by the applicant and allowed by the ED (see A 113(2), decisions T 647/93; T 946/96 and T 237/96). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an examination appeal that might help you to become familiar with some intricacies of G 1/07.The application dealt with guidance in adjusting bone incision blocks. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:29 am
With his response "R3" to summons for oral proceedings, the applicant filed amended claims of respectively a main and an auxiliary request, together with arguments. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:15 am
G 3/08, OJ EPO 2011, 10, reasons 12.2.2, T 1145/10 of 26 February 2016, reasons 5). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:33 pm
T 19/90). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the granted patent read: A method for determining T-cell epitopes within a protein comprising the steps of: (a) obtaining from a single human blood sample a solution of dendritic cells and a solution of naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells; (b) promoting differentiation in said solution of dendritic cells; (c) combining said solution of differentiated dendritic cells and said naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells with a peptide of interest; (d) measuring the… [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
The Washington Post has the interview here.It shouldn't be big news that Paulson says there are "no preconditions" for talks on Social Security reform. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
This very long – 123 pages – decision contains lots of interesting procedural aspects (it’s one of those decisions where the appellants are desperate enough to invoke Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention, which is never a good sign) and is well worth skimming through. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:25 pm
Texas Lawyer's John Council today reported that Marshall's federal judge T. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 2:12 am
I don’t know. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Unfortunately, the issues that arise from a lack of proper Estate Planning on death don’t care who we are. [read post]
