Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:18 am
United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:01 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
" Two recent decisions by different divisions of the Dusseldorf Regional Court show that German judges will effectively apply a "willing licensee" standard akin to what we see in standard-essential patent (SEP) cases all the time--even where a proportionality defense is raised in a non-SEP dispute.There was a little bit of a discussion after the IP Bridge v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
TOM JUZWIAK V. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 am
In Sociedade-de-Fomento Industrial Private Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 10:37 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
In answer to the questions posed in the UPDATE below, Peter Goldberger has cited the Supreme Court's Dec. 23, 1974, decision in Schick v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
In Kelton v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
But one recent ruling out of that court seems to be getting little notice: Utah v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 4:16 am
See Norcross v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am
Wade (or, to be more pedantic, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am
Bell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
To see what we mean, one need only look to United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
Lord Justice Arnold recapped the current position in England and Wales with regards to website-blocking, noting 20th Century Fox v BT (Newzbin 2) wherein he granted the first such injunction in 2011, and the first application and injunction in relation to trade marks in Cartier v Sky. [read post]
